Jason Cochran

Stuff you never knew you never knew

Oklahoma movie poster

Fire down below: Laurey and Curly reach the climax

You may think the musical Oklahoma! is a sweet little show about friendly farmers and cowmen, but I’ve got an arousing awakening for you. Oklahoma! is drenched in sexual innuendo, rape metaphor, and bestiality references. After all, the whole plot revolves around who gets to take Laurey to the “box social” — a coded consummation metaphor if ever there was one.

Many years ago, I wrote this (don’t worry, it’s pretty short and it moves fast) about the 1955 Fred Zinnemann movie version of Rodgers and Hammerstein‘s 1943 Broadway musical Oklahoma!. As I decode this assumed G-rated masterpiece for torrid subtext, I guarantee that you will never look at that chestnut the same way ever again.

I wrote this for a film studies course at Northwestern University. It’s a little-known fact that the history and writing of the American musical is a special discipline of mine. I don’t talk about it much, but it’s true. I even have an MFA in music theatre from New York University, a lot of good may it do me.

I wrote this mostly as a lark to see what I could get away with, but it holds up. May my perspective make this old snoozer recharged with sexual energy for you.

+++

Much has been written about the significance of Oklahoma! in the history of American musical theatre.  Most historians place it as the milestone in the integration of the musical’s construction in conveying themes, plot and character.  Its reputation among laymen is one of a simpleminded, quaint musical.  What both factions ignore in their analyses, however, is that Oklahoma! is full of subtle but rough-hewn sexual and violent undertones that in fact contradict its reputation as mere mild entertainment.

Oklahoma! was released in 1955 after the New York and touring companies had closed and introduced the new wide-screen process called Todd-AO.  It was re-released in 1956 by 20th Century Fox in CinemaScope.  It tells story of Curly McLain (Gordon MacRae) and Laurey Williams (Shirley Jones), who, in a fit of coquettish spite, accepts an invitation to a social from the brute farmhand Jud Fry (Rod Steiger).  Laurey’s ensuing self-torment plus the tension between Jud and Curly drives the plot from that point on.  True to the Rodgers and Hammerstein style, there is also a contrasting subcouple in the form of Will Parker (Gene Nelson) and Ado Annie (Gloria Grahame), who pines for any man with a seductive intent, including the peddler Ali Hakim (Eddie Albert).

Oklahoma! has reached the status of an enduring classic, thanks mostly to its mainstream proliferation through the Fred Zinnemann film.  While its bumpkin characters seem homey and charming in light of modern musical works, the film itself remains fresh and entertaining.  The songs and dancing are in part responsible for that, but one might argue that its nearly perverse subthemes of sexual desire and violence help the film maintain a gripping, if subconscious, appeal.

The primary sexual themes of Oklahoma! play themselves out in its characters.  There is Laurey, the virginal girl coming of sexual age; Curly, the suave, sexy charmer clearly obsessed with bedding Laurey; Ado Annie, the girl, recently come of sexual age and unable to control her sexual impulses — a victim of her own Freudian id; Jud Fry, who represents an unfettered, unchivalrous sexual carnality that contrasts the cultural expectations of Claremore; Ali Hakim, also a victim of his own id but, unlike Annie, quite aware of his manipulatory manner of obtaining gratification; Will Parker, who is like Laurey in his virginal, wide-eyed view of sex; and Aunt Eller, the matriarch-cum-madam of Claremore, wise in the ways of sex and lust and engrossed with matchmaking her Laurey with a suitable sexual partner — the handsome Curly.

It is Aunt Eller who carries out the first sexual act, which, like everything else in Oklahoma!, is disguised with a down-home flavor.  She is seen daydreaming and churning butter (a subliminally phallic gesture), no doubt dreaming of her younger, sexual days.  When Curly chats with her, she keeps her eyes focused on him, surveying him and continuing her phallic strokes.  The first thing she says to him also indicates her sexual desire for the virile Curly: “If I wasn’t an ole woman, and if you wasn’t so young and smart-alecky, why, I’d marry you and git you to set around at night and sing to me [i.e. be intimate with me]”  Aunt Eller’s churning halts when Curly mentions Laurey, her niece.  Although Aunt Eller wears a smile as he mentions her, she promptly stops her action and opens up the churn — in essence, castrating Curly in any hopes of making love to such an “ole woman.”  In a moment, she’s scooping out globs of butter and saying “you young ‘uns!” (The dairy product metaphor for sex is repeated during “I Cain’t Say No”: “S’posin’ ‘at he says ‘at you’re sweeter’n cream/ And he’s gotta have cream er die?”  And later, women’s home-cooked meals are auctioned to their suitors at the Skidmore Ranch.)

The butter metaphor is by no means the only sexual undertheme perpetrated by Aunt Eller.  In fact, throughout the film, Aunt Eller is the only person in Claremore who seems to be wise to the ways of sex and appreciates fully the sexual goals of the courtship ritual.  Her primary function is that of matchmaker for the girls, helping them obtain a suitable sexual partner.

Oklahoma movie still

Nice basket: Curly is obsessed with getting into Laurey's hamper

For example, she opens her home to all the couples on the way to the Skidmore Ranch.  Once inside, the ladies undress and primp themselves in preparation for their evenings with the menfolk.  Not only is the “Many a New Day” scene voyeuristic on behalf of the viewers, but it is a depiction of how Claremore girls pride themselves on catching a man.  The number itself represents contradiction — it’s a feminist stance yet sung while in underwear.  Although Laurey may deny the idea that her world centers around a man, we also discover the shallowness of her decree when she nearly breaks down at song’s end.  During the song, there are a number of sexual issues: girls try to outdo each other with attractiveness and showiness, women tie their corsets with thrusting, rhythmic pulses and two pubescent girls become frustrated with their own lack of expertise.  While the girls primp and preen inside, comparing undergarments and discussing sexuality, the men are outside, dipping their heads in a horse trough.   The statement of who’s luring who is more than implicit.

Aunt Eller in essence affects the whole plot.  She uses Jud to make Curly jealous enough to try harder for Laurey but when Jud’s obsession becomes apparent, she gets worried.

Aunt Eller also endorses the men in their own pursuit of more vigorous sexual satisfaction.  In the “Kansas City” scene, she reacts to the assumed pornography inside the “Little Wonder” first with the expected, gender-ascribed disdain (“The hussy!”) but then gives the men approval from the other side of the sexual fence of experience when she says “How do you turn the thing to see the other pitcher?”  Plus, underneath her grey dress she wears a flaming red petticoat, which she flashes along with her legs to the camera in “Kansas City.”  Later in the number, Will Parker chooses Aunt Eller over the two adolescent girls, presumably because of her knowledge in sexual matters.  The lyric of the song depicts sexual awakening (i.e. the stripper in Kansas City) and sure enough, soon the two adolescent girls are petting Will and sheepishly trying to get him to notice them.  At the point when he does embarrassedly notice the two girls, Aunt Eller vanishes off the left of the screen into the train office.  It’s almost as if she was making herself scarce to matchmake Will with the young ladies.

She matchmakes at other times, too, stressing physical contact over romantic courtship: (“Why don’t you grab her and kiss her when she gets that way, Curly?”)  When Laurey and Curly finally do wed, she protects their intimacy within the house by halting the shivoree crowd at the stoop.

Aunt Eller seems to be very much in control of the townspeople and supervises their mating.  During “The Surrey With the Fringe on Top,” she is shown as the only object in the Todd-AO vista, gazing intently at Curly and Laurey.  In “Kansas City,” she escorts the ensemble to the far end of the train platform with outstretched arms, as if pushing them.  In “The Farmer and the Cowman,” she whips out a pistol and forces everyone to dance.  Also, even though Curly is about to be killed by the “Little Wonder,” Hakim wastes time in telling Aunt Eller about the hidden knife, and she is the one to save Curly’s life; the matchmaking must go on, and by her hand.  She even literally auctions off the girls at the social like a whorehouse madam.  Yet, however in control she may be, as when she threatens Ali Hakim with an eggbeater down his windpipe, she retains her sexuality, getting a pair of garters in the bargain.

Violence is hardly scarce in Oklahoma! as far as sex goes.  In fact, Oklahoma seems to be teeming with an undercurrent of unfulfilled sexual desire and violence waiting to emerge, be it between farmer and cowman or two eligible ladies.  Each man seems willing to kill to obtain his love.  Curly tries to convince Jud to commit suicide.  Jud tries to kill Curly twice (once with a sexual toy).  Will tells Ali he would kill him for Annie.  Gertie Cummings has fights with both Annie and Laurey (rolling on the ground, of course).

The community structure of Claremore revolves around obtaining sex through appropriate societal channels.  Marriage is usually the way to get that sex.  When a marriage proposal (and thus the promise of sex) arrives, it is monumental.  When Annie is engaged to Ali, she promptly goes to report it to the other girls in the community.  Laurey and Curly’s marriage is also a community spectacle.

Premarital sex is often alluded to, however, particularly through the lusty characters of Annie and Ali, who would be termed “sexual addicts” in today’s America.  Says Will: “I’m goin’ t’marry her!”  Ali: “On purpose?,” implying the famous Oklahoma shotgun marriage.  Obviously, any moral code isn’t apparent to Ali.  He wants to bed Annie in the Claremore Hotel.  He also suggests that he, Laurey and Annie engage in a menage a trois by skinny dipping together.  He’s been “feeling up” Annie behind the haystack (his confession that results in his shotgun engagement to Annie). At the end, he’s caught in illicit (by Claremore standards) sex and forced by shotgun to marry Gertie Cummings.  Finally, he sells garters and bloomers and other forbidden delights like drugs (the Egyptian smelling salts).

In Oklahoma!, women obtain sexual fulfillment when in a semi-drugged state.  “Laurey’s Dream” is the most obvious example.  Ado Annie, too, seems ever-comatose and virtually unresponsive, doggedly singing her number “I Cain’t Say No.”

Gloria Grahame as a vamp

This is how movies audiences knew Gloria Grahame before she played Ado Annie: As a sex addict of another kind

Also, the sexuality of women is related to beasts in Oklahoma!  During “Kansas City,” as Will describes the round shape of the burlesque queen, the non-diagetic sound of a horse whinny is mixed in.  Later in the number, he sings to his horse as one of the pubescent, sexually-unready girls faintly tries to grab his attention.  Before the reprise of “I Cain’t Say No,” Annie compliments Will’s manner of roping horses in between his sexual advances.  He also tells Annie that roping steers all day makes him think of her.  The connection between beasts and sex is obvious. Later, after “All ‘Er Nothin’,” he pens Annie in with a farmyard fence like a common hog before kissing her.  Even Ali Hakim joins in, describing Annie’s “soft, round tail.”  At first glance, these allusions seem rustic and apropos for the midwestern setting, but in actuality they are blatant objectifications.

As in other film musicals, dance implies sex.  In “Kansas City,” Will tries to teach the young girls how to dance — i.e. how to become sexually mature enough to capture his attention.  In her dream, dancing with Jud symbolizes Laurey’s moral decay and at the social, she reels in disgust at the prospect of dancing with Jud.  Also at the social, Annie and Will go from dancing together to immediately and furtively sneaking away for hanky-panky — the natural progression.  Also, Annie laments Will’s own fidelity after he dances with the two pubescent girls.

Unlike other film musicals, however, blatant objectification of sex is not used much.  It is cloaked instead under the character and custom of the Oklahomans.  Lusty observation of the opposite sex is frowned upon.  Jud peeps on Laurey twice in the film but that act is in no way presented as positive or does it instill desire in the audience.  The only time the women are put on pedestals for the men in the town is during the hamper auction.  Although the metaphor of the woman’s sexuality as a scrumptious meal for her suitor is striking (and it is repeated when Will compares Ado’s mouth to ripe berries in the reprise of “I Cain’t Say No”), it is hardly as blatant as, say, a Ziegfeld girl, showing legs and bosom with come-hither glee.  Like all sexuality in Oklahoma!, the sexuality of the girls is obscured by the charm of local custom.  As an audience unused to such coding, we see the custom but not the actual sexuality itself, mistaking it for chivalry.

Each character fits into this chivalric custom.  Jud is ostracized not for his sexual desires (even Will owns the “Little Wonder”) but mostly for his selfish and coarse refusal to cooperate with the chivalric code.  Curly is attractive because he tries to turn its tables and have the women proposition him.  Romance comes when we sense his intense desire to abandon egocentricity and conform to the code, which he eventually does when he proposes humbly to Laurey.  Annie’s sexual drive is not reprehensible because she is unaware of her indiscretions and is instead fulfilled by them.  Furthermore, she obeys the chivalric code and promptly responds to all gentlemanly advances.  Laurey is the perfect ingenue — virginal and a victim of a man’s romantic system, resorting to dreams for her sexual fulfillment.  Will, intent on obeying the code at the cost of $100 total, is just discovering the wonders of romance and thus excusable from his reckless tendency to woo every available female.  Ali Hakim is a rascal for his shrewd manner of circumventing the code, and also forgivable because of his pure wheedling, con-man ability.

Oklahoma! is not without out-and-out innuendo, however.  Take, for example, Will’s “Oklahoma Hello,” in which Annie is straddled (like a horse — the woman as a beast theme) about the groin.  Later, at film’s end, a disheveled Will and Annie have clearly been screwing around behind the house: “You missed all the excitement!” someone says.  Annie responds, dazed: “No, we didn’t.  Hello, Will,” and Will giggles. Did they engage in sex during the trial scene? The audience must guess, but given Annie’s insatiable appetite and Will’s hankering for Annie, we imagine they have.

Naturally, such open-ended presentations and cultural cloaking was the only way that Oklahoma! could appeal both to New York’s sly but conservative audiences and later slip by the film’s censors.  Like Cole Porter’s famous double-entendres, Hammerstein’s suggestive script (which was adapted almost word for word by Sonya Levien and William Ludwig for the film) managed to carry off dozens of sexual themes under the pretense of a simple, enigmatic culture.

There’s a storehouse of sexual activity swarming in Oklahoma! and enough to fill several ten-page papers.  In overview, however, it suffices to note the several main themes in the film: the cloaking of continual sexual pursuit beneath local custom and chivalry, the dependency of each character on that custom, the matriarchal presence of the madam Aunt Eller and the existence of other major themes such as the sexual linkage of beasts and dancing as they relate to Oklahoma!‘s setting and genre.  In those themes alone there is enough to give any Rodgers and Hammerstein fan pause as she or he considers Oklahoma!‘s innate sexuality and perversity.

+++

Gertie Cummings? Really?

College is hot.

Oklahoma movie still

It's not "Porky's." It's R&H: Laurey bathes in front of Ado Annie

Categorised in: Articles

Tags: , , ,

67 comments. Add a Comment:

  1. Mindy says:

    Clearly a deep thinking, thought provoking individual . I’m left to wonder if he might see any sexual innuendo in the book, “Holes in the Mattress” by Mister Cpmpletely.

  2. I’m forever dismayed by people who choose to attack personally rather than discuss arguments on their merits.

  3. Kate Sims says:

    As a woman who was a teenager in the midwest when the movie premiered, I was neither shocked nor surprised by your analysis but very amused. You are obviously from a more recent generation intent on “decoding” an artifact of a buried civilization (the 1950s and before; the original play is from 1930). Before the “sexual revolution”, which occurred between the availability of the birth control pill and the onset of AIDS, sex was a mysterious and dangerous act but hardly hidden from view. I learned the facts of life from the smutty cartoons and jokes in my grandfather’s sportsman’s magazines (yes, the ones he left in the outhouse) and Reader’s Digest stories of Soviet tortures. Talk about perversions……

    (Parents even today still try to “protect” their children from any premature knowledge of what everyone claims is natural and healthy). Before the pill, a girl who went “too far” ruined her chances of a good marriage, college or a career; an honorable man who got a girl pregnant could ruin his life, too. However complex “Oklahoma” is about sex, it has none of these complications; the young people literally have nothing on their minds but finding the right mate.

    See any of Kansan William Inge’s major plays of the same era for the real story (teenage sex leads to madness (Splendor in the Grass) and embittered marriage (Come Back Little Sheba), lack of sex to desperate spinsterhood (Picnic); no one has been tempted to make a musical out of those.

  4. Mike says:

    Like Anne, I am about to direct this piece. Jason, I think your analysis is spot-on, but that doesn’t mean that I am going to costume everyone in codpieces and bloomers. Certainly the undercurrent of sex is part (perhaps a large part ) of what keeps this piece popular after seventy year. It portrays emotions that we wrestle with today and it does it well.

    A few years ago, I was in a production of Hamlet where the director told us as we were analyzing the text, that if we thought a line was prurient, it probably was….and if we didn’t think it was, then we should re-read it. It looks like Oklahoma may be the same.

    Thanks for giving me an additional piece of info to chew on Jason…..and for those who have condemned you for offering a thought, please remind them that ‘1984’ is only a book. (I hope)

  5. Kate Sims says:

    I just finished reading the source play for Oklahoma!, the 1931 play by Lynn Riggs, Green Grow the Lilacs (in a “reading version” published by Samuel French). It has sex in it that the creators of the 1950s musical could not dare to put in a movie. Laurey bullies Ado Annie, Curley is so nasty to Jud (Jeeter in the earlier version) that one can conclude that he probably did want to kill him.

    Rodgers and Hammerstein bowdlerized the play so it is fit for kindergartners!

    Oh, and Jason can you decode the musical standards of the era, like “The Nearness of You” and “All Through the Night” to detect references to sex????

  6. Jerry Thornhill says:

    Enjoyed both the article and the variety of comments it generated., especially the contradicting viewpoints where each contains some truth. Even the first time I saw “Oklahoma” I caught most of the innuendo and symbolism and just took it for granted, thinking this is how things are expressed. Every boy-chases-girl-until-she-catches-him story is, at root, about sex. That’s understood. Finding a way to make it interesting and compelling, to make an audience find connections, and to make it into an enjoyable show–that’s where the art is.

  7. Stacy says:

    I love your review on Oklahoma! It is really hilarious! Do you have one for the movie Carousel too?

  8. Haley Anniston says:

    Interesting article! While I’m still processing the whole thing, I knew there had to be a reason who Aunt Eller had a red petticoat underneath her normal=looking dress. It was quite odd and a bit out of place, as if it was hinting something. As a fashion designer and someone who sews these sorts of things now and then, there was a specific choice for that aesthetic.

  9. Stacy says:

    I love your review of this, it was really true though. Judd was a dirty creep who wanted to kill Curly for his own selfish reasons. Do you have a review of the movie Carousel?

  10. Sjl says:

    Your a pig if you read this much into a movie. Get a life and a job

  11. I think you mean “you’re.”

  12. Margaret Golden says:

    I found this article because last night I watched a youth production of Oklahoma! and was deeply disturbed. The audience seemed to love it, and I was the only one whoo seemed uncomfortable with it. I came home and watched some clips of the movie and found myself outraged at the themes of objectification, rape, violence, etc. And YES! Watching an eight-year-old rhythmically plunge a phallic stick into the butter churner rather horrified me, and I noticed that the cream bit came up frequently. The production was “tweaked” of much of the lines/lyrics, which makes me wonder if the producer and director saw the themes as problematic as well. Butter/cream is so frequently a sexual allusion (Shakespeare, “Put your hand to the buttery bar and let it drink!”) What truly disturbed me is that this piece is still performed by our YOUTH! Sadly there are few musicals that pass the Bechtel test. Oklahoma! should be (pardon the pun) put to bed. It’s time children have new role models. In the wake of the Stanford rapist trial, No Means No. It is NOT okay to threaten a woman with violence when she declines your advances. I am so glad I found your article. I feel validated (though as a woman I’m not sure why going with my gut isn’t enough. We are always told to ignore our feelings.) You didn’t mention “All or Nuthin'” which also bothered me. The free-spirited Annie becomes a wild-animal now tamed (beastiality theme) when she says something like “If you’re sleepy, I’ll just fall asleep,” effectively silencing her own voice and succumbing to his demands, rendering her powerless. Annie’s lyrics then go on to allow WILL to go out and have fun, stay out till three, but her own sexuality is to be shut down like a frontal lobotomy, deadened, save for Will’s own personal commands. It ends with Will, satisfied that Annie has “learned her lesson” he demands that she give him a kiss. He has finally roped the prize cow. Thanks for this insightful article. And for those who don’t see that which you refer to, some day you will HAVE to pull your head out of the sand. If you don’t see it, you are no doubt objectifying women and do not see misogyny in our culture, something you need to see so the next generation can learn.

  13. Donna Boggess says:

    Oh my! We just started rehearsing for this show and I was cast as Aunt Eller. I will be seeing my character in a different light, now. She does seem to run the town, however. Our director, who is marvelous, actually said Aunt Eller would ride away with any of these cowboys. Very interesting!

  14. Bill Fisher says:

    Having had the fun time of being cast as a fisherman on an Oklahoma Lake catching a whopper (which actually was a whopper as the director tied off the fishing line to an anchor so it looked like I was catching a whale) in a few seconds clip amongst all the other clips enacting out the scenes of the words for our State Song… Mine words were “O-O-O-O-Oklahoma!” acting much more demonstrative over that “fish” than I ever thought about doing when a mountain, fishing and hunting guide 11,620′ up above Taos and Red River in New Mexico. But it was what the Director wanted, and… the Show must go on!), I find this whole Powwow silly from your “paper” to the “responses of insite” and depths of appreciation of your comments.

    You folks who are so hung up over sexual innuendos, beastial sex, box lunches (really?), etc. and looking to find a sexual context to everything in this movie have most unlikely 1: never been around a ranch or farm animals, 2: have never been to the smaller, sweeter, more normal communities of the West (Especially not in the 50’s) and 3: whether written for a college paper and thereby trying to impress a professor, “theater aficionados” or fellow shallow thinking and acting people, or just trying to find something for you to be different about, ALL of you folks who are trying too hard to be too cool don’t know diddly squat about Oklahoma.

    My background in the arts has been in music (with a little acting in small movie parts, political commentary and a TV guiding show) from a young kid on up to my years of touring producing concerts, being the Road Manager of touring bands and singing on and helping engineer some recordings in Nashville and New York… Real stuff, getting it right the first time and freaking people out in sold out venues from the Savoy to festivals of 44,000 folks all around the Continent above the Rio Grande..

    On top of that, I first started cowboying (and still am, both here in America and now setting up 100 LARGE Ranches in a nation in western AFrica) with my Uncle Rusty and my Daddy at the age of 3. Daddy had me tugging for all I was worth on the end of a fairly long ope Daddy and Rusty had snubbed up an old heifer with pinkeye on so they could give her a hypodermic shot IN her swollen up eye to save her vision and most likely her life. (And their money.)

    All I needed to do was just keep the rope snug and not falling off the post while the dallys’ friction on the post was what kept it and her tight with Daddy wrestling her horns still, and rusty holding her slobbering nose quiet with one hand and making sure he wasn’t jabbing himself with the needle in the other.
    But far as I knew, I’d been tasked with saving Rusty’s and Daddy’s lives. And they never told me different, but I did figure it out myself with a few more years in my boots.
    I’ve been involved with ranching hands on and off ever since, along with some other pretty wild adventures in b’ness..

    And I can guarantee you that there didn’t USED to be one ranch kid who wasn’t completely aware of sex. It’s an everyday thing as you’re around cattle, horses, dogs, pigs, birds and the bees. It’s been the main means of why we’re still here.

    Most folks in Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado, New Mexico, etc. knew sex was and is grand, but we also knew collectively that it should be protected and saved for marriage as a unique celebration of the forever Covenant between a man, a woman and the Lord. Not that everybody did, as there are these things called hormones, and I’m NOT referring to failing to pay her, though I NEVER paid ANYONE for sex, immediately. I have paid for the whole enchilada after getting married.

    What’s funny to me is that evidently you’ve been able to pull the wool over some people’s eyes where they’re trying to take this hogwash literally! Now, that’s funny… I don’t care who you are!
    And if you’ve actually pulled the wool over your OWN eyes, that’s even funnier, but sad at the same time.

    Anybody who thinks that R&H were sending out subliminal messages about rape, masterbation, menage a trois, or any OTHER thing untoward, are, as Will Rogers OF Claremore used to say, “Full of hooey.” And “Hooey” is what one wipes off one’s Cowboy boots before entering the house or what-not.

    Giving you the benefit of the doubt after reading your replies to the folks who took you up short, I think that, just as in college, even here you’re being a prankster with your tongue in cheek. (That ISN’T a metaphor for kissing or any other practice with bodily orifices.)
    Some of the most randy and happy folks I’ve ever known have been superiorly happy Christians, making love with each other on a regular basis in communion with each other, some on up into their later 70’s. (Do NOT be so arrogant as to think “EEWW!”

    My folks were with each other on up into their 80’s but by then, it was with the sensuality, humor, affection, appreciation and Love for each other rather than merely physical conjoining.
    They were married 63 years when just before departing in his sleep to be with Jesus, my Mom tucked my Daddy in with a kiss, and his last words to her were “I love my little Wifie.” Not that’s truly Hot Love.
    When Mom went Home, I was clearing up their home and found a birthday card she’d given Daddy when he was 81 or so, and after he died, she kept it on her nightstand to sometimes cuddle, but to always physically connect her to their 2/3rds of a Century together in a literally blissful marriage relationship. She had signed it to him, “I love you, Tiger!” Pretty cool stuff.

    And not all that uncommon from the Truly Free folks who almost ALL were in a church every Sunday morning in almost EVERY small town in Oklahoma when I was a kid, and at least the surrounding States as well as I was able to be taken to Sunday School in some little town every Sunday morning for thirteen years of perfect attendance, no matter what State we were on vacation in, traveling through or looking for property in. (Mother and Daddy liked to collect mountain property.) My folks had a commitment to each other in the Lord, and to me too.
    It’s a shame I became a quasi-prodigal son for about ten years, but I too came Home to my Father, as my folks had done before me as well.

    I’d suggest you guys all just lighten up, forget your Freudian hang ups (he was full of hooey too), just enjoy the musical for the simpler, mostly honest and more enjoyable times that they were. At least you can enjoy them now for what they were, as I doubt they’re ever coming back, though Jesus Is!
    Search for the Peace and Meaning to Life you’re craving, (whether you’ll quiet down enough to admit that to yourself or not) and He Will Reveal Himself to you, if you’re honest.
    And if you don’t want to meet Him now as the Prince of Peace and the Lamb of God, know that one of these Days before very long, you WILL Meet Him as the King of Kings and the Lion of Judah, but for you then, that will NOT be a Good thing… Inevitable and certain, but horrendously tragic as you’ll have blown off your chance to receive His Free Gift of Salvation when your time is up and over in the here and now and you face your final Judgement in His Righteousness. That ISN’T a fable or tall tale.
    As it says in the Bible, “Today is the day of Salvation.” If I were you guys, I’d pay attention.

    AND it would be nice to not have to type in this gray font on a black background. What’s up with that, some fetish of death during sex? Might tell your IT guys…

  15. MPac says:

    I am fascinated with other people’s defensive attachment to this musical. While I don’t agree with all of your analysis, you make some great points. And I believe there’s always merit in analysis, in examining things from different POVs – it’s a sign of maturity and intellect. I don’t want to be a passive receiver of entertainment but too often am. So bravo to you – we need analysis like this.

  16. Linda A Johnson says:

    :Your essay was probably greatly enjoyed by your professor. I enjoyed reading it and agreed with your comments possibly 80 % or more of the time. Never thought about the dancing as substitute for sexual scenes. Yeh, right, today they have the sexual scenes…I prefer the musicals of yesteryear. I thought, ‘Im just a Girl who Cant say No ‘ most sexual when I first saw the film. The sexual attraction on screen between Curlly and Laurey was very evident, and whole movie, I always thought, very sexual. I had to laugh about the ole lady and her churning butter…wud never have thought of that as sexual, but probably was, hmm…you are very good at analyzing things. Where there is smoke there is fire, and the movie really ‘smoked’! Thanks, it was a good and interesting read.

  17. Antony says:

    BUT….HE NEVER DID ANYTHING!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

WordPress Lightbox Plugin